I would like to comment about a statement made by Neil deGrasse Tyson during and episode of Cosmos.  He said "The theory of global warming is as much of a theory as the theory of gravity." Now, this is not a direct quote as I cannot remember his exact words but his point was since the theory of gravity is a fact then the theory of global warming is a fact.  He obviously does now know the difference between fact and theory. 

The only thing we know about gravity that can be considered a fact is Newton's Law, which is nothing more than an equation that can be used to predict what happens but cannot say why.  We still do not know what gravity is or why it does what it does.  That is a fact.  So...Neil is correct in his statement, although the point he made is the opposite of the point he wanted to make.  We know the earth has warmed a little but we have not proved why.  It is all theory and theory is not fact. 

Some may say 'but we have evidence to support the theory.'  Of course you do.  It would not be a theory if there was no evidence to support it.  It cannot be called a theory without evidence.  It would only be a hypothesis.   Never forget that theories change all the time as new evidence is discovered.

 "No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong." - Albert Einstein 

I would like to share part of a discussion with a liberal about guns.  The discussion moved toward a woman defending herself with a gun and killing a would be rapist.  I have edited the discussion by removing the liberal's name and changing my name to Me.  Other than that, everything has been copied word for word.

About using a gun to defend yourself from rape

Liberal - “If she shoot him an he dies then she'll have to live with that the rest of her life. It could seriously scar her emotionally.”

Me - “You don't think being raped will scare her emotionally? You don't think being raped will haunt her for the rest of her life? What if he kills her when he's finished?  What about the women he rapes after her? At least by killing him, he will never rape anyone else. She can at least receive a little comfort knowing she saved other women from that fate.”

Liberal - “But killing is just wrong! She has no right to kill anyone!  ”

Me - “He's a criminal and a rapist!”

Liberal - “Not unless convicted and even so ANY killing is wrong!!!!”

Me - “I bet you don't have a problem killing unborn children.”

Liberal - “Thats not the same thing! A fetus is not even human!”

Me - “The definition of fetus is 'unborn young of any vertebrate, particularly mammals, after it has acquired its basic form' so, a human fetus is very much a human.”

Liberal - “No its not! It's nothing more than a mass of cells! Its like cancer growing in a woman body or a parasite!”

Me - “You really believe that? If so...I just don't know what to say. I feel sorry for you.”

Liberal - “Dont feel sorry for me. You are the idiot with your stupid belief in your god and your war on women! Do the world a favor and go home and take one of those guns you love so much and place it in your mouth and pull the trigger.”

Me - “Such a violent person! Aren't you gong to call me a racist and bigot also?”

Liberal - “Im not violent, YOU are violent! You want to kill people! You gun nuts want to bring back the old west! You hate women you hate the poor you hate gays you hate african americans! Like Oprah said you just need to die!”

Me - “LOL...OK, then...You have opened my eyes. I can see that you are a typical tolerant, non violent liberal and I am a typical intolerant, greedy, violent, gun loving conservative. I don't think we have anything else to say to each other. Have a nice day.”

Liberal - “Fuck you asshole!”

 

I chose not to respond to his last colorful statement.  This is a typical example of almost every discussion I have had with liberals. I will probably post more in the future.

This first post is a question about something that really annoys me.  Why do so many white females speak with what I call a 'lazy' voice these days?  If you don't know what I mean, I'll try to describe it.  They speak as if they don't have enough air in their lungs and they are almost straining to get the words out, or as if they are not using their diaphragm. It produces a gravely sounding voice that is extremely unfeminine and very annoying once you are conscious of it.

I don't really know what causes it, as I am unable to reproduce the sound at will, although I have caught myself doing it (rarely) on a word on occasion.  Some only do this with a few words, usually the last words of a sentence, as if they have run out of air before they finish speaking, while others do it on every single word.  What I really don't understand is why this phenomenon is getting worse.  Its become extremely bad over the last ten years.  If you look back to the TV shows in the 1980s and 1990s it is almost nonexistent.

I don't mean to pick on white females as I have heard other races and ethnic groups do this, as well as men, but it is a rarity for them, and white females are far more likely to have this "affliction."

A good example of what I am describing can be heard on the show Flip or Flop. Christina El Moussa has a pretty severe lazy voice. I don't mean to pick on her, she seems like a very nice person.  She is just a good example.

http://www.hgtv.com/shows/flip-or-flop

About this blog

This is a place where being Politically Correct is not allowed.   I am going to be myself and speak the truth.  If it offends anyone, too bad. Never forget this fact - a person chooses to be offended.  I cannot offend you nor can you offend me.  It is purely a choice.  I will expand on this later. If you feel you are 'offended' then remember this - Everyone has the freedom and the right to stop reading, just as I have the freedom and the right to keep typing.